![]() “It is not about forcing people to look into this if they are not ready yet. “This topic is not for everyone,” added Graves, who came forward with his own experience with UFOs hovering over his F/A-18 Hornet fighter jet in 20. He’s joined by Ravi Kopparapu, a planetary scientist at NASA who is studying the potential habitability of Earth-like planets. Image above: Enhanced Apollo 16 image (left) compared with features of the EVA floodlight/boom from the perspective of a Command/Service Module window (right).“We’re stepping in a new territory,” said Ryan Graves, a former Navy fighter pilot and defense contractor who is co-chairing AIAA’s Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena Community of Interest. ![]() There is no evidence in the photographic record to suggest otherwise." They also looked at archived images from other Apollo missions.īottom line: "All of the evidence in this analysis is consistent with the conclusion that the object in the Apollo 16 film was the EVA floodlight/boom. The combinations showed them more clearly a "linear feature" attached to one side of the object. The investigators also combined several frames in a sequence, to give them higher resolution and greater contrast than individual frames. One thing that showed them was that the object appeared to move slightly with respect to the moon, because of parallax brought about by slight camera motions and the nearness of the object to the camera. They stabilized images to correct for camera movement, and then aligned multiple frames in a sequence. Image on left: View of the Apollo Command/Service Module from the Lunar Module during Apollo 17 showing the location of the EVA floodlight/boom. They used a video copy of the film initially, then did a high-resolution digital scan of the original film for detailed analysis. There is no indication the Apollo 16 crew ever thought the film showed anything special.Ī group headed by Gregory Byrne of Johnson Space Center's Image Science and Analysis Group completed a report on its investigation earlier this year. Their conclusion was that the object wasn't at all what some observers thought it seemed to be. Some very bright people recently worked hard to analyze that footage. ![]() As the camera pans, it moves out of the field of view. The object appears momentarily near the moon. The thing was described as "a saucer-shaped object with a dome on top." The images were captured with a 16mm motion picture camera shooting at 12 frames per second from a command/service module window. Image on right: Image enhancement of the object and linear feature. Credit: NASAīeginning their return from the moon to an April 27, 1972, splashdown, Astronauts John Young, Thomas Mattingly and Charles Duke captured about four seconds of video footage of an object that seemed to look a lot like Hollywood's version of a spacecraft from another world. ![]() Reflections in the window are also visible (left and right). Image above: High-resolution, digital scan of a full frame from the original Apollo 16 film showing the object in question (top center) and its position relative to the moon. And some purported UFOs aren't UFOs at all. UFOs aren't necessarily alien spacecraft. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |